VISHAL SRINIVASAN v. UNION OF INDIA NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU
CRL.P/11238/2025 · 2026-04-25
R Nataraj
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2106 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2106 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52157 CRL.P No. 11238 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 11238 OF 2025 (439(Cr.PC) / 483(BNSS)) BETWEEN:
1.
VISHAL SRINIVASAN, S/O SRINIVASAN, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, NO.5/26, F-66, PAARI NAGAR, KADAMPADI, NEAR AIR FORCE STATION SULUR, COIMBATORE, TAMIL NADU-641401.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI.VIJAY KASHYAP S., ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
AND:
1.
UNION OF INDIA NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU, REPRESENTED BY INTELLIGENCE OFFICER, BANGALORE ZONAL UNIT, BENGALURU, REP. BY LEARNED SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR OR CENTRAL GOVERNMENT COUNSEL FOR NCB HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BANGALORE-560 001.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI.RISHAB TRAKROO., ADVOCATE FOR SRI.MADHUKAR M DESHPANDE ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by LAKSHMINARAYANA MURTHY RAJASHRI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52157 CRL.P No. 11238 of 2025
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 CRPC (FILED UNDER SECTION 483 BNSS) BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL WITH RESPECT TO SPL.C.NO.76/2024 FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 8(c) READ WITH SECTION 22(c), 23(c), 28 and 29 OF NDPS ACT.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
ORAL ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner is absent.
2. The learned counsel for the respondent is present, and submits that copy of the petition papers have not been served on them.
3. On 20.08.2025, the learned counsel for the petitioner has been directed to serve a copy of the entire petition to the learned standing counsel for the respondent. On 14.11.2025, the learned counsel for the respondent submitted that he has not been served the copy of petition papers. On that day, the learned counsel for the petitioner was absent, and there was a direction to
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52157 CRL.P No. 11238 of 2025
the learned counsel for the petitioner to serve petition papers on the learned counsel for the respondent.
4. Today, the learned counsel for the petitioner is absent. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE
BKM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 23