Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21057 (KAR)

SMT. M LAKSHMI DEVI v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/6076/2021 · 2025-01-07

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:382 WP No. 6076 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 6076 OF 2021 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. M.LAKSHMI DEVI W/O SRI ANANTHU, D/O LATE MUNISWAMY, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS. 2. SMT. MANJULA M., W/O LATE NAGARAJ, D/O LATE MUNISWAMY, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, 3. SRI LAKSHMI NARAYANA.M S/O LATE MUNISWAMY, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, 4. SMT. M.GANGADEVI W/O NARASIMHAMURTHY, D/O MUNISWAMY, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, 5. SUBHASH S/O LATE ANANTHU, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, 6. SMT. NETHRAVATHI @ NETHRA D/O LATE ANANTHU, AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS, SL. NO. 1 TO 6 ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO.18/1, 1ST MAIN ROAD, 3RD CROSS, Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:382 WP No. 6076 of 2021 A.K.COLONY, VIJAYANAGARA, BENGALURU - 560 040. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI K.P.JAYASIMHA., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDA, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE CITY POLICE COMMISSIONER, OFFICE OF THE BENGALURU CITY POLICE, COMMISSIONER, INFANTRY ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHANTESH SHETTAR., AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Jayasimha.K.P., counsel for the petitioners and Sri.Mahantesh Shettar., AGA for the respondents have appeared in person. Counsel Sri.Jayasimha.K.P., submits that the Writ Petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:382 WP No. 6076 of 2021 When queried, counsel Sri.Jayasimha.K.P., submits that a conscious decision is taken by him and the petitioners to withdraw the Writ Petition and if an order is passed, they shall not seek for recalling the same or file review petition. The oral submission made by counsel for the petitioners about withdrawal of the Writ Petition is placed on record. The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 3 Sl No.: 29