[2025:RJ-JP:24819] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 3418/2025 1. Sonu Son Of Lacchiram, Aged About 33 Years, 2. Harendra Son Of Virendra, Aged About 17 Years, 3. Satendra Son Of Virendra, Aged About 19 Years, 4. Jagveer Son Of Lacchiram, Aged About 26 Years, 5. Lacchiram Son Of Ramkaran, Aged About 51 Years, 6. Virendra Son Of Ramkaran, Aged About 65 Years, All are Resident of Saidoli, Tehsil Nadbai, District Bharatpur (Raj.) Accused-Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. …….Non-Petitioner 2. Ratiram Son Of Ramkaran, Aged About 60 Years, Resident Of Saidoli, Tehsil Nadbai, District Bharatpur (Raj.). …..Complainant-Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mritunjya Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP Ms. Mamta Yadav Ms. Seema Mr. Pawan Kumar Verma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 07/07/2025 1. This petition under Section 528 of BNSS is filed, with a prayer to quash the FIR No.212/2025 registered at Police Station Nadbai, Bharatpur for offences under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2) and 303(2) of BNS, on the basis of compromise effectuated between the parties herein, in respect of their inter-se dispute. [2025:RJ-JP:24819] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-3418/2025] 2. Learned counsel for both the parties, in presence of their respective clients, have submitted that the dispute at hand is inter-se private in nature, which has been resolved by the parties amicably. 3. Heard and considered. 4. At the outset, this Court deems it appropriate to place reliance upon the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab [(2012) 10 SCC 303] and Ramgopal Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh reported in [2022 (14) SCC 531], relevant portion of which is reproduced below: “12. The High Court, therefore, having regard to the nature of the offence and the fact that parties have amicably settled their dispute and the victim has willingly consented to the nullification of criminal proceedings, can quash such proceedings in exercise of its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C., even if the offences are non- compoundable.” 5. In view of the position of law laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in aforementioned case, and considering the personal nature of dispute, which has been amicably settled between parties, this Court deems it just and proper to allow the present misc. petition. Compromise is taken on record. 6. Considering the aforementioned, the present criminal miscellaneous petition is allowed and the FIR No.212/2025 registered at Police Station Nadbai, Bharatpur with all consequential proceedings, are hereby quashed and set aside. [2025:RJ-JP:24819] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-3418/2025] 7. Accordingly, the instant petition is allowed. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/312