Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21051 (AP)

SHAIK ALI MURTHUZA v. THE HONBLE IV ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

WP/15610/2025 · 2025-07-02

Dhiraj Singh Thakur, R Raghunandan Rao

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010296482025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) m THURSDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CHIEF JUSTICE - '•'V.V- AND HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 15610 OF 2025 Between: Shaik All Murthuza, S/o Jamal Saheb, aged about 44 years, R/o Iskapalli Village, Allur Mandal, SPSR Nellore District. ...PETITIONER AND The Hon’ble IV Addl. District Judge, In the Court of Honble Principal District Judge, District Court Compound, Nellore City, SPSR Nellore District. ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus (or) any appropriate Writ directing the Respondent for registering the interlocutory application filed in CF No.223/2023, by the Petitioner U/s 340 of CrPC r/w Rule 62 of A.P.CRPCO 1992, and to dispose of the same in accordance with the Law, or otherwise the process of Court in O.S.No.52/2019 on the file of Respondent will be jeopardized and to grant such other reliefs which this Honble Court may deem fit and proper in to these circumstances of the case to secure the ends of Justice. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent to submit a Report about the due diligence conducted by them in regarding Suit Scheduled property mentioned in OS No.52/2019 on their file in view of the declarations made by the Government authorities as it IS concocted one and not physically existed vide PR.No.6/1970 and to grant such other reliefs which this Honble Court may deem fit and proper in to these circumstances of the case to secure proper administration of Justice Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI O. VENKATA RAJU(Not Present) Counsel for the Respondent:— The Court made the following order: S APHC010296482025 Bench Sr.No:-38 [3446] IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WRIT PETITION NO: 15610 of 2025 ...Petitioner Shaik Ali Murthuza Vs. ...Respondent The Hon’ble IV AddI District Judge ********** None Advocate for Petitioner; Advocate for Respondent: CORAM :THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO : 3'^“ July, 2025. DATE PC : None for the petitioner. Even on the previous date of hearing, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner has lost interest in the matter. The present writ petition is accordingly dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, in this petition, shall stand closed. Sd/- Wl. SRINIVAS assistant registrar sectf6n%^icer //TRUE COPY// To, 1. One CC to Sri O. Venkata Raju, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CD Copies. ssb HIGH COURT DATED:03/07/2025 ORDER WP No.15610 OF 2025 18 JUL 2025 X 9/ ^ . Current Section ^ DISMISSING THE W.P. FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS