Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21050 (RAJ)

SUNITA WIFE OF AJAY KUMAR BHASKAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLAS/1592/2025 · 2025-06-25

Sudesh Bansal

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:23529] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 1592/2025 Sunita Wife Of Ajay Kumar Bhaskar, R/o, Sultana Police Station Sultana, District Jhunjhunu (Raj) Presently Residing At Gadakheda, Police Station Singhana, District Jhunjhunu (Raj) ----Appellant Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Public Prosecutor 2. Rohitasav Kumar S/o Shri Chagn Singh Meena, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Village Kishopura, Tehsil Chirawa, District Jhunjhunu (Raj) ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Sandeep Garssa For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL ( V. J.) Order 25/06/2025 1. Instant appeal has been filed under Section 14A(2) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act 1989 on behalf of the appellant, who is in custody in connection with FIR No.62/2024 at Police Station Sultana, District Jhunjhunu for offences under Sections 420, 406, 120-B of IPC and Section 3(2)(va) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. 2. Learned Public Prosecutor submits that information to the complainant has already been sent. However, no one has put in appearance on behalf of the complainant. 3. Heard. 4. It has been argued that appellant has falsely been implicated due to dispute of dissolution of partnership with the complainant [2025:RJ-JP:23529] (2 of 2) [CRLAS-1592/2025] in respect of running a college; appellant's husband was also implicated, who has been released on bail by the Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 23.08.2024; parties have entered into compromise; the conclusion of the trial may take considerable time, but without commenting on merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to release the appellant on bail. 5. Consequently, the instant appeal is allowed. The impugned order dated 20.05.2025 passed by the Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Cases, Jhunjhunu is set aside. It is ordered that the accused-appellant Sunita W/o Ajay Kumar Bhaskar arrested in aforesaid FIR, shall be released on bail, if not required in any other case, provided she furnishes a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. (SUDESH BANSAL ( V. J.)),J RONAK JAIMAN/168