Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:4905] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 20/2025 Sagir S/o Jamil, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Lalwadi Police Station Datwas District Tonk At Present Ashok Vihar Makan Number 19 Police Station Mohana District Jaipur Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In District Jail, Ajmer (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rohit Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 04/02/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.387/2024 registered at Police Station Nasirabad Sadar, District Ajmer for the offences punishable under Sections 3, 5, 6, 8, 9 & 10 of Rajasthan Bovine Animal (Prohibition of Slaughter and Regulation of Temporary Migration or Export) Act, 1995. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submit that allegation against the petitioner is that he was transporting bovine animals in truck. It is submitted that petitioner was not apprehended at the spot. He was arrested on the basis of the fact that he is the registered owner of the vehicle
[2025:RJ-JP:4905] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-20/2025] in question. Learned counsel contends that petitioner has no criminal antecedents of similar nature and he is in custody since his date of arrest. Trial will take time in its conclusion and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, as also considering the fact that petitioner has no criminal antecedents of similar nature, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6.
This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Sagir S/o Jamil, shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. However, it is made clear that the petitioner shall not involve in similar offence(s) during currency of bail granted by this Court. The petitioner is further directed to mark his presence in the concerned police station in the first week of every month, till trial
[2025:RJ-JP:4905] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-20/2025] is concluded. If breach of any of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial court to cancel the bail granted to petitioner by this Court. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /354