Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (108)
CWP-25089-2025 Date of decision:- 19.01.2026 Dr. Kanu Sharma
...Petitioner
Versus State of Punjab and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL Present:- None for the petitioner.
Mr. Siddharth Sandhu, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab
…
SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (Oral)
1. Yet again, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
2. Petitioner has remained unrepresented on the previous three occasions.
3. It seems that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the instant writ petition.
4. Dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
(SUVIR SEHGAL)
JUDGE 19.01.2026 Pardeep
Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No PARDEEP NAUTIYAL 2026.01.20 12:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment