KURDARAM S/O SHRI MANGLARAM v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/8973/2025 · 2025-07-01
Anil Kumar Upman
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21048 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21048 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:24071] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8973/2025 Kurdaram S/o Shri Manglaram, Aged About 75 Years, R/o Godaro Ka Bas, Bhodaki, Tehsil Gudha Gaurji, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus
1. The State of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. The Joint Secretary To Govt. Revenue (Group-6) Department, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
3. The District Collector, Jhunjhunu (Raj.)
4. The Sub Divisional Officer, Jhunjhunu, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.)
5. The Sub Divisional Officer, Udaipurwati, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.)
6. The Tehsildar Gudha Gorji, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.)
7. The Superintendent Of Police, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.)
8. The Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Udaipurwati, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Kumar Singodiya For Respondent(s) : ----- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 01/07/2025 After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file appropriate representation before the authority concerned for ventilating his grievances. Permission as sought for is granted.
[2025:RJ-JP:24071] (2 of 2) [CW-8973/2025] Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty, as prayed for. Petitioner is directed to file appropriate representation before the authority concerned within a period of two weeks from today. If any representation is filed by the petitioner within a period of two weeks from today, authority concerned is directed to consider the same and pass a speaking order within a period of six weeks from the date of filing of representation. Concerned authority is further directed to communicate the same to the petitioner. This Court has not passed any observation on the merits of the case and thus, the representation, if any filed by the petitioner, may be decided in accordance with law without being influenced or prejudiced by this order.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /43