APHC010297392025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) SMS TUESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 15043 OF 2025 Between: 1. Yadala Appalaraju, S/o. Chinna Sattibabu, Age; 23 years, Occ Labour, R/o. H.No.7-18, Avulamanda Village, Thondangi Mandal, District, Andhra Pradesh. 2. Yadala Subbalakshmi, W/o. Chinna Sattibabu, Age: 49 years, Occ Housewife, R/o. H.No.7-18, Avulamanda Village, Thondangi Mandal, Kakinada District, Andhra Pradesh Kakinada ...PETITIONERS AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its PrI. Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh 2. The Superintendent of Police, Kakinada District, at Kakinada, Andhra Pradesh. 3. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Tuni, Kakinada District, Andhra Pradesh. 4. The Station House officer, Thondangi Police Station, Kakinada District, Andhra Pradesh. 5. Arugula Govind, S/o. Sattibabu, Age: 33 years, Occ; Technician, R/o. Avulamanda Village, thondangi Mandal Pradesh. Kakinada District, Andhra f--, 6. Arugula Srinu, S/o. Sattibabu, Age 30 years, Occ Technician . Avulamanda Village, Thondangi Mandal Pradesh. 7. Arugula Varahalu, S/o. Subbarao, Age 23 years, Occ Labour, R/o. Avulamanda Village, Thondangi Mandal, Pradesh. 8. Arugula Manikanta, S/o. Devudu, Age 25 years, Occ Labour Avulamanda Village, Thondangi Mandal Pradesh. 9. Arugula Siva Krishna, S/o. Devudu, Age 22 years, Occ Labour, R/o. Avulamanda Village, Thondangi Mandal, Pradesh. 10. Arugula Sattibabu, S/o. Adaiah, Age 55 years, Occ Agriculture, R/o. Avulamanda Village, Thondangi Mandal, Pradesh R/o. Kakinada District, Andhra Kakinada District, Andhra R/o. Kakinada District, Andhra Kakinada District, Andhra Kakinada District, Andhra ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one Writ of Mandamus, by declaring the action of the 4*'' Respondent and to harass the Petitioners by calling to the 4 in the nature of his staff th respondent police station and to insist to withdraw the complaint which is given against the respondents No.5 to 10 by the 2nd petitioner as illegal and arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and unconstitutional. Consequently to direct the 4‘^ respondent and his staff not to harass the Petitioners by calling the Petitioners to the 4^^ respondent police station and not to insist to withdraw the which is given against the respondents No.5 to 10 by the 2 complaint nd petitioner. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4*^ respondent and his staff not to harass the Petitioners by calling the Petitioners to the 4*^ respondent police station and not to insist to withdraw the complaint which is given against the respondents No.5 to 10 by the 2 petitioner, forthwith. nd Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI CHENNAKESAVULU KOTTE Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent Nos.5 tolO:— The Court made the following order: APHC010297392025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) SMB [3457] TUESDAY ,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTYFIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 15043/2025 Between: Yadala Appalaraju and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The State Of Ap and Others Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1.CHENNAKESAVULU KOTTE Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GPFOR HOME The Court made the following: ...RESPONDENT(S) ORDER:- The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that respondent Nos.4, 5 to 10 are repeatedly pressurizing the petitioners to withdraw the complaint filed by petitioner No.2 against the respondent Nos.5 to 10. The learned Assistant Government Pleader submits that respondent 2. No.4 is not interfering with the peace of the petitioners. 3. Considering the submissions, there shall be a direction to respondent No.4 not to disturb the peace of the petitioners and not to pressurize the petitioner No.2 to withdraw the complaint filed against the unofficial respondents. It is made clear that respondent No.4 shall not disturb the peace of the petitioners without following due process of law. With these observations, this Writ Petition is disposed off. No costs. 4. ^ s As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- K. TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To 1. The Prl. Secretary, Home Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat, Velagapudi, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh 2. The Superintendent of Police, Kakinada District, at Kakinada Andhra Pradesh. 3. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Tuni, Kakinada District, Andhra Pradesh. 4. The Station House officer, Thondangi Police Station, Kakinada District, Andhra Pradesh. 5. One CC to Sri Chennakesavulu Kotte, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 7. Two CD Copies V'lf- HIGH COURT DATED:24/06/2025 ORDER WPNo. 15043 OF 2025 O' s 16 ;!riL 20?5 tn Co ^ Current Section ^ DISPOSING OF THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS