CONT.P(MD).No.3342 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :21.11.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA CONT.P(MD).No.3342 of 2025 in W.P.No(MD).13085 of 2025 A.Sakthivel ... Petitioner Vs. T.Maheshwaran The Commissioner, Kayalpattinam Municipality, Thoothukudi District. ... Respondent PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to issue contempt proceedings as against the contemnor / 3rd respondent for his wilful disobedience in the order granted by this Court I W.P(MD).No.13085 of 2025 dated 29.04.2025 and punish them under Section 11 of the Contempt Courts Act, 1971. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Jegadeesh Pandian For Respondent : Mr.V.Nimal Kumar 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CONT.P(MD).No.3342 of 2025 O R D E R This Contempt Petition has been filed to punish the contemnor / 3rd respondent for his wilful disobedience in the order granted by this Court made in W.P(MD).No.13085 of 2025 dated 29.04.2025 2. When the matter came up for hearing, it is reported by the learned counsel for the respondent, on instructions, that the amount has been disbursed to the petitioner and a communication has been received, in which, it is stated as follows: “,e;efuhl;rp nghwpahsh; mwpf;if gb> Nkw;gb xg;ge;jjhuUf;F jdpauhy; jw;NghJ tiu Kbf;fg;gl;Ls;s gzpfSf;fhd gFjp gl;bay; njhif fPo;f;fz;lthW toq;fg;gl;Ls;sJ. (nkhj;j Ntiyapd; kjpg;G - &. 27.91 ,yl;rk;). t.vz; Toq;fg;gl;l njhif ehs; 1. &.13.50 ,yl;rk; 13.06.2024 2. &.10.00 ,yl;rk; 15.11.2025 ,J tiu nkhj;jk; toq;fg;gl;l njhif &.23.50 ,yl;rk; MFk;. kPjp toq;fg;glNtz;ba njhif &.3.38 ,yl;rk; 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CONT.P(MD).No.3342 of 2025 MFk;. jw;NghJ tiu fl;bl gzpfs; midj;Jk; KbTw;W> Rw;Wg;gFjpapy; Ngth; gpshf; fw;fs; gjpf;fg;glNtz;Lk;. ,g;gzpfs; KbTw;wgpd;dh; nra;J Kbf;fg;gl;l gzpfSf;Nfw;g kPjp njhif toq;fg;gLk;. ,j;Jld; gzpfs; njhlh;ghd Gifg;glq;fs; jq;fsJ Nkyhd ghh;itf;F ,izj;J mDg;gg;gLfpwJ vd;w tpguj;jpid gzpTld; njhptpj;Jf;nfhs;fpNwd;.” 3. It is the contention of the respondent that the work has not been completed. 4. Be that as it may, considering the fact that the orders of this Court has been complied with, this Contempt Petition is closed. If the petitioner has any objection to the amount that has been paid, it is open to him to claim the difference in the manner known to law. 21.11.2025 NCC:yes/no Index:yes/no Internet:yes/no Rmk To The Commissioner, 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CONT.P(MD).No.3342 of 2025 Kayalpattinam Municipality, Thoothukudi District. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CONT.P(MD).No.3342 of 2025 P.T.ASHA, J. Rmk CONT.P(MD).No.3342 of 2025 in W.P.No(MD).13085 of 2025 21.11.2025 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis