IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11108 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1198 Year-2022 Thana- VAISALI COMPLAINT CASE District- Vaishali ====================================================== 1. Gul Mohammad S/O Late Md. Safee R/O Village- Sahdullpur-2, P.S- Sakra, Distt.- Muzaffarpur. 2. Saiful Nisha W/O Gul Mohammad R/O Village- Sahdullpur-2, P.S- Sakra, Distt.- Muzaffarpur. 3. Md. Mubarak S/O Gul Mohammad R/O Village- Sahdullpur-2, P.S- Sakra, Distt.- Muzaffarpur. 4. Md. Hadish S/O Late Md. Subezan R/O Village- Boariya, P.S- Sakra, Distt.- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Jahana Khatoon W/O Md. Murtuza, D/O Md. Nazir R/O Village- Sahbajpur Puraina, P.S- Patepur, Distt.- Vaishali. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nachiketa Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Zainul Abedin, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 18-03-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. 2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code. 3. As per complaint case, marriage of the complainant was solemnized with co-accused Md. Murtuza on 6.5.18 and thereafter, it is alleged that all the F.I.R. named accused persons including these petitioners tortured and harassed the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11108 of 2025(2) dt.18-03-2025 2/3 complainant due to non-fulfillment of demand of motorcycle as dowry and eventually, ousted her from the matrimonial house. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner No. 1 is father-in-law, petitioner No. 2 is mother-in- law and petitioner No. 3 is brother-in-law of the complainant and petitioner No. 4 is Fufa of the husband of complainant. He further submits that petitioners are separate in mess and property and they have got no concern with the affairs of the couple. Petitioners are simply victims of over-implication. Moreover, thrust of accusation is against husband of the complainant. Petitioners claim clean antecedent. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the bail application. 6. Considering the fact that thrust of accusation is against husband of the complainant, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Complaint Case No. 1198 of 2022, subject to condition as Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11108 of 2025(2) dt.18-03-2025 3/3 laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Navya/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T