APHC010297542007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 21969/2007 Between: 1. RAJAHMUNDRY APPARAO, VSP DIST. & ANOTHER, S/O.APPALA SWAMY (LATE) W/O. VEERANNA R/O.D.NO.50-84-3, MADHURANAGAR, SEETHAMMAPETA, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 2. EANCHARAPU RAMULU, S/O.PYDAYYA (LATE),M W/O. APPAYAMMA R/O.DR.NO. 4-117, GITAM COLLEGE POST RAJINAGAR, YENDADA, VISAKHAPATNAM DIST. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. PRL SECY FINANCE HYD 2 OTHERS, TO GOVERNMENT FINANCE (WORKS & PROJECTS), A.P. SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER R B, N.H. CIRCLE, VISAKHAPATNAM-18. 3. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER R B, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an order or direction declaring the action of the respondents in issuing the proceedings dated 26-6-2007 in so far as denying Gratuity to the petitioners for the service rendered by them is illegal, arbitrary and unjust and consequently direct the respondents to pay Gratuity/terminal benefits to the petitioners for the servicer rendered by the respondents as per Gratuity Act and also as per G.O.Ms.No.1311, dated 21.6.68, and pass such other order or orders. IA NO: 1 OF 2007(WPMP 28471 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to pay the Gratuity amount to the petitioners, pending disposal of this Writ Petition and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. G RAVI MOHAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR ROADS BUILDINGS 2. GP FOR FINANCE & PLANNING The Court made the following: ORDER Despite listing the matter under the caption “for dismissal”, there is no representation for the petitioners. This shows that the petitioners are not interested to prosecute the matter. In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI RR