Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21035 (GAU)

PANKAJ DAS v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

AB/3090/2024 · 2025-05-27

Mridul Kumar Kalita

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010248442024 2025:GAU-AS:6945 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/3090/2024 PANKAJ DAS S/O SRI KAMAL CHANDRA DAS R/O VILL- KODOMTOLA PT.II P.O. BILASIPARA P.S. BILASIPARA DIST. DHUBRI, ASSAM PIN-783348 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MD H R AHMED, M BEGUM,MR J ISLAM,MR J I MONDAL Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA ORDER 28.05.2025 1. Heard Ms. N. Nasrin, the learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. R.J. Baruah, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State of Assam. Page No.# 2/2 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner was granted interim bail by this Court, by order dated 27.11.2024, and in pursuant to the directions of this Court, the petitioner has appeared before the Investigating Officer and has co-operated in the investigation. She also submits that in the meanwhile, the charge sheet has been laid in this case and the petitioner has received summons from the Trial Court in PRC Case No. 78/2025. 3. In view of the fact that the charge sheet has been laid in this case as well as the fact that the petitioner has complied with the directions of this Court and has co-operated in the investigation, the interim anticipatory bail granted to the petitioner, by order dated 27.11.2024 is hereby made absolute with a condition that the petitioner shall continue to co-operate in the trial. 4. With the above observations, this anticipatory bail application is accordingly disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant