APHC010297462025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1602/2025 Between: 1. KAKARLAPUDI SRINIVASA RAJU,, S/O. VENKATESWARA RAJU AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC- CONTRACTOR, R/O. D.N0.7-815-1/A, 5TH LINE, SAMATHA NAGAR, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI SASHI BHUSHAN KUMAR IAS, WORKING AS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYATHI RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT (RWS-I) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS, WORKING AS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. SMT A THAMEEM ANSARIYA IAS, WORKING AS DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 4. SRI Y KOTESWARA RAO, WORKING AS EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PRI DIVISION, KANDUKUR, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 5. SRI J RAVI KUMAR, WORKING AS DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PRI SUB-DIVISION, KONDEPI, PRAKSAM DISTRICT. 2 6. SRI P SRINIVAS PRASAD, WORKING AS PROJECT OFFICER, HOUSING CORPORATION DEPARTMENT, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to punish the Respondents herein under sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Court Act, 1971 for willfully and disobedience of the Orders passed by Honble Court in WP No. 13892 of 2024, dated.07.08.2024 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SHAIK MEERAVALI Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. RAMA RAO KOCHIRI 3 The Court made the following Order: The learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that, the order under contempt has already been complied with, as the payment was made today only as per the instructions from the 2nd respondent dated 04.09.2025, which shall be made as part of court record. 2. In view of the same, nothing survives in this contempt case and accordingly, it is closed. Interim order if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN 04s.09.2025 NNN