IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11513 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-51 Year-2024 Thana- BACHHWARA District- Begusarai ====================================================== 1 . Surendra Rai Son of Late Shrawan Rai @ Sharwan Rai Resident of Village - Mau, Dhaneshpur, P.S. - Vidyapati Nagar, District - Samastipur 2. Krishnanand Rai Son of Ramsulesh Rai @ Ramjulush Rai Resident of Village - Bishanpur, Lodiyahi, P.S. - Bachhwara, District - Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sandip Kumar Gautam , Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar , APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 21-03-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State . 2. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 341 , 323 , 379, 384, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code . 3 . As per the prosecution case , on 29.02.2024 at around 9.00 AM, when informant went to his ancestral land, he saw that all the accused persons including these petitioners were uprooting his crops. It is further alleged that upon protest by informant, these petitioners threatened him by putting pistol on his neck and also demanded rangdari of Rs. 25,000/- and when Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11513 of 2025(2) dt.21-03-2025 2/3 informant denied then all the accused persons assaulted him and due to fear informant gave Rs. 10,000/- to them. 4. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that from perusal of F.I.R., it is evident that parties are on litigating term since long because in the year 2001 , his father namely Birendra Sikngh was kidnapped for which Bachhwara P S Case No. 50 of 2001 was lodged and in the aforesaid case the name of Arjun Rai who happens to be father of petitioner No. 2 was accused. He further submits that the aforesaid case was lodged in the background of land dispute and the land in question was purchased by ancestors of petitioner namely Mahavir Mahto and Ramdeo Mahto . Informant has no concern with respect to the aforesaid land in question . Rest of allegations are ornamental in nature . No money was delivered to this petitioner. Petitioners claim clean antecedent. 5 . Learned counsel for the State oppose the bail petition . 6 Considering the aforesaid facts, clean antecedent of these petitioners and other circumstances of the case , in the event of arrest or surrender within eight weeks from today , let the petitioners, as named above , be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11513 of 2025(2) dt.21-03-2025 3/3 sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate begusarai in connection with bachwara P.S. Case No. 51 of 2024 , subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure . Koushik/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T