Ramanyyapeta Gram Panchayat v. Koppisetty Venkataramana,
CRP/1544/2024 · 2025-07-16
T C D Sekhar
Original Suitbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21034 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21034 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010297172024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1544/2024 Between:
1. RAMANYYAPETA GRAM PANCHAYAT, REP. BY ITS PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, RAMANYYAPETA, KAKINADA RURAL MANDAL, KAKINADA DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. KOPPISETTY VENKATARAMANA, S/O. MANIKYAM, AGED 37 YEARS, CALLING NILL, D.NO.9-10. AMARAVADI GARDENS,
RAMANAYYAPETA, KAKINADA RURAL MANDAL, KAKINADA.
2. KOPPISETTY MANIKYAM, S/O. APPANNA, AGE 65 YEARS, BUSINESS, D.NO. 9-10, AMARAVADI GARDENS, RAMANAYYAPETA, KAKINADA RURAL MANDAL, KAKINADA.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to allow the CRP by set aside the order in I.A.No.1957 OF 2023 in O.S.No. 327 OF 2014 dated 02.02.2024 on the file of the III Additional District Judge, Kakinada and to pass
2 TCDS,J C.R.P.No.1544 of 2024
IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in O.S.No.327 OF 2014 on the file of the III Additional District Judge, Kakinada pending disposal of CRP and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. N SRIHARI (Standing Counsel for ZPP MPP and GRAM PANCHAYAT) Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. P RAJASEKHAR
3 TCDS,J C.R.P.No.1544 of 2024
The Court made the following order:
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause in the revision petition does not survive.
2. The said submission is placed on record.
3. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
4. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR
Date: 17.07.2025 KGR