Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21032 (GAU)

MOHAMMED AZAHAR AND 6 ORS v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR

Crl.Pet./1261/2022 · 2025-09-18

Mridul Kumar Kalita

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010248092022 2025:GAU-AS:13026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Crl.Pet./1261/2022 MOHAMMED AZAHAR AND 6 ORS S/O IQBAL KHANNA, R/O WARD NO. 15, ROAD NO. 2, OPPOSITE ASHOK MARKET, P.O. AND P.S. JHUNJHUNU, DIST. JHUNJUNU RAJASTHAN, PIN-333001. 2: IQBAL KHANNA S/O LATE NATHU KARIM R/O WARD NO. 15 ROAD NO. 2 OPPOSITE ASHOK MARKET P.O. AND P.S. JHUNJHUNU DIST. JHUNJHUNU RAJASTHAN PIN-333001 3: MRS. BILKISH BANO @ BALKESH BANO W/O IQBAL KHANNA R/O WARD NO. 15 ROAD NO. 2 OPPOSITE ASHOK MARKET P.O. AND P.S. JHUNJHUNU DIST. JHUNJHUNU RAJASTHAN PIN-333001 4: DR SAYED SAJID KHAN S/O IQBAL KHANNA R/O PHC QUARTERS NIRADHANU JHUNJHUNU SH-37 JHUNJHUNU ROAD Page No.# 2/3 JHUNJHUNU RAJASTHAN- 333001 5: MRS. SAYED SAJIDA W/O KAYAMUDDIN D/O IQBAL KANNA R/O C-27 BENIWAL KANTA SURAJ COLONY RAMGARH ROAD JAIPUR RAJASTHAN-302002 6: MRS. SAYED KHALIDA @ KHALIDA BANO QUARASIHI W/O AYUB QURAISIHI D/O IQBAL KHANNA R/O 4-3-60-1 BARI COLONY BAYJIPURA AURANGABAD MAHARASHTRA-431001. 7: MISS. SAYED SAIN @ SHAHIN AFREEN D/O AYUB R/O WARD NO. 15 ROAD NO. 2 OPPOSITE ASHOK MARKET P.O. AND P.S. JHUNJHUNU DIST. JHUNJHUNU RAJASTHAN PIN- 33300 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM 2:BISMILLAH BANO W/O MOHAMMED AZHAR D/O MOHAMMAD ALI R/O HOUSE NO. 48 IMDADLA HOSPITAL ROAD NOTBOMA Page No.# 3/3 GUWAHATI P.O. AND P.S. HATIGAON DIST. KAMRUP (M) ASSAM-781038 PHONE NO. 94013-7792 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR F KHAN, MR P R SARMA,RIYAZ KHAN,RHITUSHREE TALUKDAR,P. NATH,K. SUMI,Q. KIBA,M. GLORY Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA ORDER 19.09.2025 1. Heard Mr. P.R.Sarma, the learned counsel for the petitioners, who prays for allowing the petitioners to withdraw the instant criminal petition as the Trial Court has dismissed the CR Case No. 2251c/2021. 2. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, this criminal petition is dismissed on withdrawal. JUDGE Comparing Assistant