Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21031 (PNJ)

RAJ KUMAR v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/4465/2020 · 2025-05-13

Vinod S Bhardwaj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 230 CWP-4465-2020 Date of decision: 13.05.2025 RAJ KUMAR ......Petitioner VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS .......Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ ***** Present: - Mr. Ram Niwas Yadav, Advocate for Mr. R.K. Doon, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Tapan Kumar, DAG, Haryana. ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The instant writ petition has been filed seeking setting aside of the Tentative Seniority List dated 13.11.2019 of Senior Account Clerks (Accounts Clerks), framed after Office order dated 31.03.2018. Learned State Counsel has informed that the instant writ petition was filed impugning the seniority list whereas the respondent- Department has thereafter finalized the seniority list vide Memo No. 2558- 75/E1 dated 11.09.2023. The seniority of the petitioner has been upgraded from 133 to 52. He contends that since the seniority list has been finalized, hence, the challenge to the tentative seniority list would no longer remain valid and if the petitioner still feels aggrieved he may take recourse to an VISHAL SHARMA 2025.05.14 18:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-4465-2020 -2- appropriate remedy against the final seniority list that stands circulated. The present writ petition is accordingly disposed of as having been rendered infructuous at this stage with liberty to the petitioner to take recourse to an appropriate remedy against the final seniority list of Senior Account Clerk/Stenographers, if so advised. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) 13.05.2025 JUDGE Vishal Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No VISHAL SHARMA 2025.05.14 18:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document