CR-851-2024 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT 279+121 VIKAS KOCHAR ROZY CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: SUVIR SEHGAL 1. Constitution of India for passed by the Family Court, Amritsar, whereby petitioner deposing has been rejected. 2. cross-examination, Annexure A that although the application was rejected by the Family Court, but S filed an affidavit and has been cross instant revision petition has become infructuous 2024 (O & M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH VIKAS KOCHAR VS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL Dr. Naresh Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vaibhav Narang, Advocate for the respondent. **** SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (ORAL) Instant revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside order dated 08.11.2023, Annexure P by the Family Court, Amritsar, whereby -husband under Order 3, Rule 1 & 2 through a Special Power of Attorney has been rejected. By making a reference to affidavit, Annexure A examination, Annexure A-2, counsel for the respondent that although the application was rejected by the Family Court, but S filed an affidavit and has been cross-examined. It is his submission that the instant revision petition has become infructuous IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-851-2024 (O & M) Date of decision:24.03.2025 ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENT SUVIR SEHGAL r. Naresh Kaushik, Advocate Mr. Vaibhav Narang, Advocate Instant revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the setting aside order dated 08.11.2023, Annexure P by the Family Court, Amritsar, whereby an application filed by the Rule 1 & 2 CPC for appearing and through a Special Power of Attorney (SPA) in a divorce petition to affidavit, Annexure A-1, and the counsel for the respondent-wife states that although the application was rejected by the Family Court, but SPA examined. It is his submission that the instant revision petition has become infructuous. .2025 PETITIONER ESPONDENT Instant revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the setting aside order dated 08.11.2023, Annexure P-1, an application filed by the for appearing and in a divorce petition, 1, and the states has examined. It is his submission that the Sheetal 2025.04.02 09:59 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Chandigarh CR-851-2024 (O & M) 3. Court had rejected the request evidence. 4. the evidence of adjudicating the divorce petition 5. 6. 24.03.2025 sheetal 2024 (O & M) -2- At this stage, counsel for the petition Court had rejected the request, testimony . To allay the apprehension of the petitioner, it is clarified that the evidence of SPA shall be taken in account and adjudicating the divorce petition. Instant revision petition is disposed off. Pending application(s) is/are disposed off. .2025 Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No At this stage, counsel for the petitioner states that as the Family testimony of the SPA may not be read To allay the apprehension of the petitioner, it is clarified that taken in account and considered while Instant revision petition is disposed off. Pending application(s) is/are disposed off. (SUVIR SEHGAL) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No er states that as the Family read in To allay the apprehension of the petitioner, it is clarified that while Sheetal 2025.04.02 09:59 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Chandigarh