Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21022 (JHR)

SANTOSH VERMA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.M.P./2534/2019 · 2025-07-21

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:JHHC:19938 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No.2527 of 2019 ------ Santosh Verma, S/o Late Bhim Verma, aged about 35 years, Resident of village Santhali, P.O. and P.S. Jasidih, District-Deoghar. … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party With Cr.M.P. No.2534 of 2019 ------ 1. Santosh Verma, S/o Late Bhim Verma, aged about 35 years, 2. Bashanti Devi, W/o Late Bhim Verma, aged about 55 years, 3. Babloo Verma @ Nitesh Verma, S/o Late Bhim Verma, aged about 32 years, 4. Dabloo Verma @ Ajay Kumar Verma, S/o Late Bhim Verma, aged about 22 years, All resident of village Santhali, P.O. and P.S. Jasidih, District- Deoghar. 5. Raushani Devi @ Rashmi Devi, W/o Sunil Verma, aged about 27 years, Resident of Karnibag, P.O.-Ashram, P.S.-Deoghar, District- Deoghar. … Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Sarita Devi, W/o Santosh Verma, D/o Rambabu Poddar, presently residing at village Balsara, P.O. and P.S. Mohanpur, District-Deoghar. … Opposite Parties ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : None For the State : Mr. Sanjay Kr. Tiwari, Addl.P.P. : Mr. Anup Pawan Topno, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No:-08 Dated:-21-07-2025 No one turns up on behalf of the petitioners in spite of repeated calls. Learned Addl.P.Ps. appearing for the State submits that there is no merit in this case, hence, the petitioners are not diligent in prosecuting this case. Accordingly, this case is dismissed for non-prosecution. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Abhiraj/