Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010247612024 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3614/2024 THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS REP. BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AND VETERINARY DEPARTMENT DISPUR, ASSAM, GHY-06 2: THE DIRECTOR OF ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AND VETERINARY DEPARTMENT ASSAM CHENIKUTHI GUWAHATI-03 3: THE BID PROCESS MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AND VETERINARY DEPARTMENT, ASSAM CHENIKUTHI GUWAHATI-03, ASSAM 4: THE DISTRICT ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AND VETERINARY OFFICER NALBARI ASSAM PIN-78133 VERSUS BALEN ROY MEDHI S/O- LATE RAJMOHAN ROYMEDHI, R/O- BHARALUMUKH, KUMARPARA, KRB ROAD, GHY-09, P.S- BHARALUMUKH, DIST- KAMRUP (M), ASSAM, PIN-781009 2:HEMANTA KUMAR BORAH RESIDENT OF SIVAMANDIR PATH KHANAPARA, GUWAHATI-22, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. D NATH, SR. GA, ASSAM Advocate for the Respondent : , Page No.# 2/3 Linked Case : CRP/0/0 THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AND VETERINARY DEPARTMENT DISPUR ASSAM, GHY-06 2: THE DIRECTOR ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AND VETERINARY DEPARTMENT ASSAM CHENIKUTHI GUWAHATI-03 3: THE BID PROCESS MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AND VETERINARY DEPARTMENT ASSAM CHENIKUTHI GUWAHATI-03 4: THE DISTRICT ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AND VETERINARY OFFICER NALBARI ASSAM VERSUS BALEN ROY MEDHI S/O- LATE RAJMOHAN ROYMEDHI R/O- BHARALUMUKH, KUMARPARA, KRB ROAD GHY-09, P.S- BHARALUMUKH DIST- KAMRUP (M), ASSAM, PIN-781009 2:BABITA BORAH SIVAMANDIR PATH KHANAPARA GUWAHATI-22 ASSA ------------ For petitioner/appellant(s) : Mr. D. Nath, Sr. GA, Assam For respondent(s) : Mr. J. Kalita, Advocate – BEFORE – HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. VIJAY BISHNOI HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR 05.03.2025 (Vijay Bishnoi, CJ) Heard Mr. D. Nath, learned senior Government Advocate, appearing for the applicants. Page No.# 3/3 Mr. J. Kalita, learned counsel has put in appearance on behalf of the sole respondent. Service of notice is therefore complete. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties, we deem it appropriate to condone the delay in filing the connected writ appeal. Accordingly, the delay of 1 (one) day in filing the connected writ appeal is condoned. Interlocutory Application stands disposed of. Learned counsel appearing for the applicants/appellants has submitted that an identical writ appeal, being WA No. 386/2024, preferred against the same impugned judgment has already been admitted and listed for hearing in due course. In such circumstances, the connected appeal be treated as admitted. No need to issue formal notice as the sole respondent is already represented by Mr. J. Kalita, learned counsel. Registry is directed to register the connected writ appeal and list the same for hearing along with WA No. 386/2024. JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Comparing Assistant