Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21020 (CHH)

VINOD KUMAR PRAJAPATI v. THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/697/2021 · 2025-02-18

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:8316-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 697 of 2021 Vinod Kumar Prajapati S/o Shri Jaishankar Prajapati Aged About 30 Years Caste Kumhar, Occupation Service, R/o Village Rajapur Police Station Jainagar, Tahsil Bishrampur, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus The State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House Officer, Police Station AJAK, Ambikapur, District Surguja Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Neeraj Mehta, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr.Sakib Ahmed, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 18 .02 .2025 1. Heard Mr.Neeraj Mehta, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr.Sakib Ahmed, learned Panel Lawyer appearing for the respondent/State. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer: BABLU RAJENDRA BHANARKAR Digitally signed by BABLU RAJENDRA BHANARKAR Date: 2025.02.18 17:58:38 +0530 2 “It is, therefore prayed that the Hon’ble Court be pleased to allow this petition, quash / set aside all the proceedings & FIR / Crime No.27/2019 registered at Police Station AJAK, Ambikapur, Distt.Surguja (C.G.) for the offence punishable Under Sections 376(2)N), 313 of IPC and Section 3(2)(V) of the Schedule Caste, Schedule Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, in the interest of justice.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the present case, the petitioner has been acquitted from the charges and as such, the present petition has become infructuous. 4. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/-/ Sd/-/ (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal ) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Bablu