APHC010296252015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] TUESDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 18088/2015 Between: 1. DR. K. ADISHESHA REDDY, NELLORE DIST., S/O SRI. VEERA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, PLOT.NO. 3 AND 4 H.NO. 4-20/52, SSS RESIDENCY, YERRABALEM VILLAGE, ADJACENT TO HOLLY CROSS SCHOOL, SULURUPETA, S.P.S.R NELLORE DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. PRL SECY M A DEPT 6 ORS, DEPARTMENT OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, ANDHRA PRADESH SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. THE COMMISSIONER, SULLURUPETA MUNICIPALITY, SULLURUPET, S.P.S.R NELLORE DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, S.P.S.R NELLORE DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. THE TAHASILDAR, MANDAL REVENUE OFFICE, S.P.S.R NELLORE DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH. 5. MS HALPANI POOJA, W/O SRI VASANTH KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O RAGHAVAIAHPET, SULURUPETA, 2 S.P.S.R NELLORE DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH. 6. AKKARAPAKA JALANDER REDDY, S/O SUBBA RAMI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O SULURUPETA, NELLORE DISTRICT. 7. SULLURU GOVINDAMMA, W/O MUNIRATNAM, PLOT.NO.1 AND 2,D.NO. 4-20/52, YERRABALAM, NELLORE DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or order or direction more particularly in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring that the inaction of the Respondent No. 1 to 4 in protecting the environment from the air, sound and water pollution and allowing illegal activities of the Respondents No. 5 to 7 is illegal arbitrary and violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the constitution of India IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP 23382 OF 2015) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass an interim direction to the respondent No. 5 and 6 not to run the brick manufacturing unit and respondent No. 7 not to run the ground nut decorticating mill Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. CH SIVA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 2. GP-MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 18088/2015 ORDER: When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Counsel for the Petitioner represented that he did not receive any instructions from his client in spite of his best efforts and therefore, he expressed his ability to proceed further in the matter. 2. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition and other miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand dismissed for non- prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J. Date: 08-07-2025 eha 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WP No. 18088 of 2015 Dt.08-07-2025 eha U