Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21010 (GAU)

PRANAB DAS v. THE BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL AND 4 ORS

I.A.(Civil)/3613/2024 · 2025-05-25

Kardak Ete

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010247762024 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3613/2024 PRANAB DAS S/O- PANKAJ KUMAR DAS, R/O- WARD NO. 3, AMGURI, DIST.- CHIRANG (BTR), ASSAM VERSUS 1.THE BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL AND 4 ORS REP. BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY BTC, BODOFA NWGWR, KOKRAJHAR, BODOLAND TERRITORIAL REGION (ASSAM) 2:THE JOINT SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPTT. BTC, BODOFA NWGWR KOKRAJHAR DIST.- KOKRAJHAR 3:THE JOINT DIRECTOR CUM COUNCIL HEAD OF DEPTT. URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPTT. BTC BODOFA NWGWR KOKRAJHAR DIST.- KOKRAJHAR 4:THE CHAIRMAN BIJNI MUNICIPAL BOARD BIJNI DIST.- CHIRANG BTR ASSAM 5:THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER BIJNI MUNICIPAL BOARD BIJNI DIST.- CHIRANG BTR ASSAM For the Applicant(s) : Mr. S. Nath, Advocate. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. R.K. Mushahary, Advocate for respondent Nos.1, 2 & 3. Page No.# 2/3 – BEFORE – HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. VIJAY BISHNOI HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE 26.05.2025 (Vijay Bishnoi, CJ) As per the report of the Lawazima Court, notice issued to the respondent Nos.4 and 5 has been duly served. Mr. R.K. Mushahary, learned counsel puts in appearance on behalf of respondent Nos.1, 2 and 3. The matter comes upon for consideration of this interlocutory application preferred by the applicant under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 with the prayer to condone the delay of 51 days occasioned in filing the connected writ appeal. Learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos.1, 2 and 3 has no objection if the delay is condoned. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and after going through the contents of the application, we deem it appropriate to condone the delay of 51 days occasioned in filing the connected writ appeal. Hence, the interlocutory application is allowed and the delay of 51 days occasioned in filing the connected writ appeal is condoned. Registry is directed to register the connected writ appeal and list the same for admission after 3(three) weeks. Page No.# 3/3 Accordingly, the instant interlocutory application stands disposed of. JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Comparing Assistant