Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Gujarat · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2101 (GUJ)

PRAHLADBHAI GANESHBHAI PARMAR v. GUJARAT VIDHYAPITH THROUGH VICE CHANCELLOR

SCA/4483/2021 · 2025-07-11

Nikhil S Kariel

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

C/SCA/4483/2021 ORDER DATED: 11/07/2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4483 of 2021 ========================================================== PRAHLADBHAI GANESHBHAI PARMAR Versus GUJARAT VIDHYAPITH THROUGH VICE CHANCELLOR & ORS. ========================================================== Appearance: MR DG CHAUHAN(218) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 RONAK D CHAUHAN(7709) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 ========================================================== CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NIKHIL S. KARIEL Date : 11/07/2025 ORAL ORDER 1. Learned Advocate Mr. Ronak D. Chauhan on behalf of the petitioner would submit that while the petition had been preferred inter alia for a direction against the respondent No.1 to pay the retiral dues including gratuity, leave encashment etc., and to fix the pension of the petitioner as per the Pension Rules, the substantial grievance of the petitioner having been redressed, the only issue which remains is with regard to arrears of pay, under revision of pay, payable under 7th Pay Commission with effect from 01.012016, not paid to the petitioner. 2. Learned Advocate Mr. Chauhan would submit that the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation and whereas the if the respondents are directed to decide the same within a stipulated time period in accordance with law, the grievance of the petitioner could be assuaged at this stage. 3. Considering the submissions made by the learned Advocate, more particularly finding the same to be reasonable, to this Court the following directions would meet with ends of justice. Page 1 of 2 C/SCA/4483/2021 ORDER DATED: 11/07/2025 (i) The petitioner is at liberty to file an appropriate representation before the respondent No.1 and 2 within a period of 15 days from today. (ii) If any such representation is received within time limit stated hereinabove, the respondent No.1, in consultation with the respondent No.2, shall pass an appropriate order, within a period of 60 days from the receipt thereof. (iii) In case the petitioner is aggrieved by the decision that would be taken by the respondent, it would be open for the petitioner to avail appropriate recourse in accordance with law. 4. With the above observations and directions, the present petition stands disposed of. 5. It is clarified that this Court has not gone into the merits of the matter and whereas the respondents shall take an appropriate decision strictly in accordance with law and in accordance with the merits of the matter. (NIKHIL S. KARIEL,J) BDSONGARA Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge. Digitally signed by: BHUPENDRASINH DHANESINH SONGARA(HC01082), Private Secretary, at High Court of Gujarat on 11/07/2025 14:19:35