2025:JHHC:22459 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Civil Revision No.36 of 2025 Om Prakash Singh, aged about 51 years, S/o Late Bindeshwari Singh, by faith Hindu, by occupation Business, R/o The Institution of Engineers, Pipe Line Road, P.O. & P.S. Sakchi, in town Jamshedpur, District-East Singhbhum, Jharkhand and at present residing at C/o. Jay Prakash Singh, 10 No. Road, Ramjanam Nagar near Ghora Baba Mandir, Kadma P.O. & P.S. Kadma, in town Jamshedpur District- Singhbhum East, Jharkhand. … Petitioner Versus 1. Amit Kumar Singh Head (Land and Market), Tata Steel Ltd. Jamshedpur, Personal No. 157388 2. Sri Sunil Kumar, Senior Area Manager, Land Department Tata Steel Ltd, Jamshedpur, Personal No. 150828. 3. Sri Rajiv Kumar Sharma Service Assistant (Land) Tata Steel Ltd. Jamshedpur, Personal No. 160837. 4. Sri Ashok Dubey, Security Inspector Tata Steel Ltd. Jamshedpur. 5. Sri Probal Ghosh Chairman, The Institution of Engineers (India) Jamshedpur Local Centre Pipe Line Road, Sakchi, P.O. & P.S. Sakchi, town Jamshedpur, District- Singhbhum East, Jharkhand, Pin-831001. 6. Sri Shanti Das Bhattacharjee, Hony. Secretary, The Institution of Engineers (India) Jamshedpur Local Centre Pipe Line Road, Sakchi, P.O. & P.S. Sakchi, town Jamshedpur, District- Singhbhum East, Jharkhand, Pin-831001 7. Krishnandu Shaw, Office Incharge, The Institution of Engineers (India) Jamshedpur Local Centre Pipe Line Road, Sakchi, P.O. & P.S. Sakchi, town Jamshedpur, District- Singhbhum East, Jharkhand, Pin-831001 … Opposite Parties Coram:HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA For the Petitioner : Mr. Jitendra Nath Upadhyay, Advocate. Order No.02/Dated- 07th August, 2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner is present. 2. Perused the office note dated 05.08.2025 regarding the maintainability of the present revision application. 2025:JHHC:22459 3. It appears that the suit filed by the plaintiff has been dismissed under Order VII Rule 11 C.P.C. which amounts to decree within the meaning of Section 2 (2) of the C.P.C. Therefore, proper remedy to the petitioner is to file appeal before the competent court. 4. Accordingly, instant civil revision is dismissed as not maintainable. (Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.) Amar/ Uploaded