Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21004 (KAR)

MAHENDRA KARLE v. SMT M RENUKAMMA

CRP/253/2019 · 2025-02-11

R Devdas

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:6093 CRP No. 253 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 253 OF 2019 BETWEEN: MAHENDRA KARLE S/O LATE L T KARLE AGED BAOUT 61 YEARS R/AT NO 165, 2ND MAIN, 1ST BLOCK, RMV 2ND STAGE BENGALURU - 560094 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MANMOHAN P N., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT M RENUKAMMA D/O LATE R MUDDAIAH W/O SEENAPPA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS 2. SMT NARAYANAMMA W/O LATE R MUDDAIAH AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS 3. SMT NAGAMMA SINCE DEAD BY HER LRS SMT MANJU D/O LATE NAGARAJU AGED ABOAUT 36 YEARS Digitally signed by DHARMALINGAM Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:6093 CRP No. 253 of 2019 4. SRI DINESH S/O LATE NAGARAJU AGED ABOAUT 34 YEARS 5. SHALINI SINCE DEAD BY HER LRS SRI M DODDAIAH S/O LATE MUDDAIAH AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS 6. SRI M RAVI S/O LATE MUDDAIAH AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS 7. SRI LAKSHMIPATHI S/O LATE MUDDAIAH AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS ALL ARE R/A GOVINDAPURA MATADA ROAD, NAGAVARA POST, NAGAVARA VILLAGE BENGALURU NORTH TALUK – 560045 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.THARESH., ADVOCATE FOR R1) THIS CRP IS FILED U/S.115 OF THE CPC AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 28.01.2019 PASSED ON IA NO.2 IN OS NO.27293/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE LXXII ADDL.CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE [CCH-73], BENGALURU REJECTING THE IA NO.2 FILED UNDER ORDER VII RULE -11[a][b] AND [d] R/W.SEC.151 OF CPC FOR REJECTION OF PLAINT AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:6093 CRP No. 253 of 2019 CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the original suit from out of which the present civil revision petition arises viz., O.S.No.27293/2012 was disposed on 10.12.2019. Therefore, the learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the prayer made in the civil revision petition has become infructuous. 2. The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is placed on record. 3. Accordingly, the civil revision petition stands disposed of, since the prayer made in the civil revision petition has become infructuous. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE KLY CT: JL