Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21000 (ALL)

COMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENT, CAPTAIN UMED SINGH INTER COLLEGE KALHOR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/5243/2025 · 2025-03-02

Saral Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:29712 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5243 of 2025 Petitioner :- Committee Of Management, Captain Umed Singh Inter College Kalhor And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Siddharth Khare,Sr. Advocate Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Vashishtha Dhar Shukla Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J. 1. Heard Sri Ashok Khare, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri Siddharth Khare, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for respondent nos.1 to 4 and Sri G.K. Singh, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri Vashishtha Dhar Shukla, learned counsel for respondent no.5. 2. The petitioner by means of the present writ petition has assailed the order dated 22.01.2025 passed by the District Inspector of Schools, Mainpuri. 3. Challenging the aforesaid order, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner has contended that election of petitioner's Committee of Management has been recognised by order dated 19.04.2022 which has been recalled by the respondent no.3 by order dated 22.01.2025. It is submitted that the District Inspector of Schools has no power to review its earlier order, and further, no opportunity of hearing was afforded to the petitioner before recalling the order dated 19.04.2022. 4. Per contra, Sri G.K. Singh, learned Senior Counsel for the respondents states that in the facts of the present case, District Inspector of Schools has not committed any error in recalling his earlier order. 5. When this Court was going to pass an interim order, Sri G.K. Singh, learned Senior Counsel for the respondents submits that the impugned order may be set aside with liberty to the newly impleaded respondent no.5 to approach the respondent no.2 in respect to her grievance. 6. In view of the submission advanced by Sri G.K. Singh, learned Senior Counsel for the respondents, the impugned order is set aside and it is open to the respondent no.5 to approach the respondent no.2-Regional Joint Director of Education, Agra Region, Agra, if it is permissible under the law. 7. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed with no order as to costs. Order Date :- 3.3.2025 Sattyarth Digitally signed by :- SATTYARTH ANAND High Court of Judicature at Allahabad