1 2025:CGHC:3009 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 44 of 2025 1. Triloki Prasad S/o Firanta Ram Aged About 32 Years R/o Village Khairwar Post - Marka, Tahsil Kawardha, District Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh. 2. Om Prakash Chandrwanshi S/o Shukhnandan Chandrawanshi, Aged About 28 Years R/o Village And Post Palansari Tahsil Pandariya District Kawardha (Kabirdham) Chhattisgarh. 3. Mukesh Chandrawanshi, S/o Manik Ram Chandrawanshi Aged About 31 Years R/o Village And Post Koko, Tahsil Kawardha, District Kawardha (Kabirdham) Chhattisgarh. 4. Pradeep Kumar Chandrawanshi S/o Kapil Ram Aged About 32 Years R/o Village Charbhata Khurd, Tahsil Pandariya, Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh, District Kawardha (Kabirdham) Chhattisgarh.] 5. Upendra Sinha S/o Maya Ram Sinha Aged About 32 Years R/o Village Khapari, Post - Chachedi, Tahsil - Kawardha, District - Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh. ... Applicant(s) versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Health, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2. Director, Health Third Floor Indrawati Bhavan Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3. Collector, Kawardha, District Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh. 4. Chief Medical Officer, Kawardha, District Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh. 5. Chief Medical Officer, Mungeli District - Mungeli Chhattisgarh. 6. Chief Medical Officer, Balod, District - Balod, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) (Cause Title is taken from Case Information System) 2 For Applicants : Mr. Ravi Kumar Bhagat, Advocate For State : Mr. Rajeev Bharat, Government Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 17. 01.2025 1. Heard an application for restoration of WPS No. 3618 of 2020. 2. Learned counsel for the applicants would submit that WPS No. 3618 of 2020 was dismissed for want of prosecution vide Order dated 12.12.2024. He would further submit that on account of personal difficulty, no-one could appear on 12.12.2024, when the matter was taken up for hearing; therefore, the petition was dismissed. He would further submit that the applicants/petitioners are interested in pursuing the Writ Petition and on merits the applicants/petitioners have a good case. He would pray to restore WPS No. 3618 of 2020. 3. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for the State would oppose. 4. Taking into consideration the prayer by Mr. Bhagat, the instant MCC for restoration of WPS No. 3618 of 2020 is hereby allowed. The WPS No. 3618 of 2020 is restored to its original number. 5. Accordingly, MCC stands disposed of.Sd Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge $iddhant