Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20998 (KAR)

GE INDIA INDUSTRIAL PVT LTD v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WA/419/2025 · 2025-04-22

K V Aravind, N V Anjaria Cj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:16556-DB WA No. 419 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF APRIL, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR N. V. ANJARIA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND WRIT APPEAL NO. 419 OF 2025 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN: 1. GE INDIA INDUSTRIAL PVT. LTD. FORMERLY GE INDIA TECHNOLOGY CENTRE PVT. LTD. 122, EPIP, WHITEFILED ROAD BNAGLAORE - 560 066 REPRESENTED BY MR. ABHISHEK BHARTI AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS …APPELLANT (BY SRI RISHAB DESAI, ADVOCATE FOR SRI ADITYA CHATTERJEE, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 4TH FLOOR, VIKASA SOUDHA BENGALURU - 560 001 2. BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER N R SQURE BENGALURU - 560 001 Digitally signed by AMBIKA H B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:16556-DB WA No. 419 of 2025 3. ASSISTANT REVENUE OFFICER HOODI SUB-DIVISION BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANGARA PALIKE BENGALURU - 560 048 4. JOINT COMMISSIONER BBMP, MAHADEVAPURA DIVISION BENGALURU - 560 048 …RESPONDENTS (SRI K.S.HARISH, GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT No.1 SRI S.H. PRASHANTH, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT No.2) THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT OF LEARNED JUDGE IN W.P. No.44589/2016 PRODUCED HEREIN AS ANNEXURE-A AND ETC. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N. V. ANJARIA and HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N. V. ANJARIA) Learned advocate Mr. Rishab Desai appearing for learned advocate Mr. Aditya Chatterjee for the appellant invited attention of the court to the memorandum of withdrawal dated 17.04.2025 which figures on record, in which it is stated that in order to put a quietus to the dispute, the appellant has paid the entire amount of - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:16556-DB WA No. 419 of 2025 tax demanded by the respondents towards property tax, difference of interest, etc. to the tune of Rs.26,85,35,626/-. Prayer is made to permit the withdrawal of the appeal. 2. Permission is granted to withdraw the appeal. 3. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. In view of dismissal of the appeal, any interlocutory application that may be pending would not survive and stands accordingly disposed of. Sd/- (N. V. ANJARIA) CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- (K. V. ARAVIND) JUDGE AHB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 103