SHANICHARWA KACHHAP ALIAS LALU v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./6888/2025 · 2025-08-08
Deepak Roshan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20997 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20997 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:23033 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 6888 of 2025
--------- Shanicharwa Kachhap @ Lalu, aged about 40 years, Son of Late Basu Kachhap, resident of-Charnabera, PO+PS-Namkum, Dist-Ranchi, Jharkhand.
....Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
....Opp. Party
---------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
--------- For the Petitioner : Avishek Prasad, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. V.S. Sahay, A.P.P.
--------- 02/Dated:-08.08.2025
1.
Heard learned counsels for the parties.
2.
The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioner for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Sections 118(1), 118(2), 109, 61(2), of the BNS Act, and 27 of the Arms Act and charge has been framed under Sections 118(1) r/w 61(2), 118(2) r/w 61(2), 109 r/w 61(2) of the BNS and under Sections 27 Arms Act r/w 61(2) BNS, 25(1-B)a r/w 35, 26 r/w 35 of the Arms Act in connection with Namkum P.S. Case No.35/2025 which is now converted into ST Case No.350/2025.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and he has not committed any offence as alleged in the F.I.R. He further submits that the petitioner was neither present at the place of occurrence nor he had any knowledge about the occurrence and only on the basis of suspicion because the petitioner is having some dispute with the informant, he has been implicated in this case. He further submits that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedents and petitioner for no offence has been languishing in custody since 24.01.2025; as such, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. He submits that the petitioner is ready to abide by every condition as imposed by this court.
4.
Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
2025:JHHC:23033 2
5.
Having regard to the facts of the case and looking to the allegation made against this petitioner coupled with the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 24.01.2025; I am inclined to enlarge this petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned AJC- XVII, Ranchi in connection with Namkum P.S. Case No.35/2025 which is now converted into ST Case No.350/2025.
6.
It is made clear that the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial court and he shall not threaten any witnesses and shall co-operate in trial and if any adverse report will come against this petitioner, learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of this petitioner.
(Deepak Roshan, J.) vikas/-