W.P.(MD) No.35911 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 16.12.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDER W.P.(MD) No.35911 of 2025 K.Ranjith ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Palani, Dindigul District. 2.The Tahsildar, Vedasandur Taluk, Dindigul District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to include the Survey No.969/1B in the Joint Patta No.1007 at Kalvarpatti Village, Vedasandur Taluk, Dindigul District on the basis of the petitioner’s representation dated 28.11.2025 within a time stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : M/s.J.Balameenakshi For Respondents : Mr.D.Sadiq Raja Additional Government Pleader O R D E R This writ petition has been filed seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the petitioner’s _____________ Page No. 1 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD) No.35911 of 2025 representation dated 28.11.2025 and include Survey No.969/1B in Joint Patta No.1007, Kalvarpatti Village, Vedasandur Taluk, Dindigul District, within a time to be stipulated by this Court.” 2. With the consent of the parties, this Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the lands in Survey Nos.970/1, 970/1B, 970/1E, 972/1A, 974/3 and 1227/4B are ancestral properties belonging to the petitioner’s family; that the land in Survey No.969/1B has been used as a common carriageway by the ancestors of the petitioner, for which Joint Patta No.1007 was issued; that subsequently, Survey No.970/1A was included in Joint Patta No.1007; that suddenly, without any notice to the petitioner or his family, Survey No.969/1B was separated from Patta No.1007 and issued as Patta No. 3362 in the names of one Rani, Balamurugan and Bagyalakshmi; that therefore, the petitioner sent a representation dated 28.11.2025 to the respondents; and that since the said representation did not evoke any response, the present writ petition has been filed. _____________ Page No. 2 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD) No.35911 of 2025 4. The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submits that the petitioner’s representation will be considered and disposed of by the first respondent on its own merits and in accordance with law. 5. Recording the above submission, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the first respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 28.11.2025 on its merits and in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The representation shall be considered and disposed of after conducting an enquiry. The first respondent is also directed to provide a reasonable opportunity during such enquiry to the petitioner and to any other interested parties who may be affected by the decision. In the event of any rival claims, the same can be agitated before the competent civil court. There shall be no order as to costs. [K.SURENDER, J.] 16.12.2025 JEN Index : Yes / No Neutral Citation : Yes / No _____________ Page No. 3 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD) No.35911 of 2025 To 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Palani, Dindigul District. 2.The Tahsildar, Vedasandur Taluk, Dindigul District. _____________ Page No. 4 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD) No.35911 of 2025 K.SURENDER , J. JEN W.P.(MD) No.35911 of 2025 16.12.2025 _____________ Page No. 5 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis