Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 209875 (MAD)

Thangavel v. The State of Tamilnadu, Represented by The Inspector of Police

CRL OP(MD)/18287/2025 · 2025-10-27

Sunder Mohan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P.(MD) No.18287 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 27.10.2025 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN CRL.O.P (MD) No.18287 of 2025 and CRL.M.P (MD) Nos.15013 and 15014 of 2025 1. Thangavel 2. Sudharsan 3. Ranjithkumar 4. Vigneshbabu ... Petitioners Vs 1. The State of Tamilnadu, Represented by the Inspector of Police, Vedasandur Police Station, Dindigul District. In Crime No.902/2021. 2. Poongodi ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS praying to call for the records and quash the charge sheet filed against the petitioner in C.C.No.171 of 2022, on the file of the Additional District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Vedasandur in respect of Crime No. 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD) No.18287 of 2025 902/2021 on the file of the 1st respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Azhagesh, For R1 : Mr.R.Meenakshi Sundaram Additional Public Prosecutor O R D E R This petition is filed for quash of the impugned proceedings in C.C.No.171 of 2022, on the file of the Additional District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Vedasandur. 2. During the course of arguments, when this Court expressed that the points raised by the learned counsel for the petitioners are factual in nature, the learned counsel for the petitioners sought permission to withdraw this petition. He would submit that the fourth petitioner is about to join a Government Job and that the pendency of the case would affect his career prospects and sought for a direction to the trial Court to conclude the trial as expeditiously as possible. 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD) No.18287 of 2025 3.This Court is of the opinion that there cannot be any direction to fix a time frame for completion of trial, as repeatedly held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. 4.However, considering the request made by the learned Counsel for the petitioners, the nature of allegations and since the case is posted for examination of witnesses on 03.11.2025, the learned Additional District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Vedasandur may expeditiously dispose of the case. 5.With the above observation and direction, this criminal original petition is dismissed. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 27.10.2025 NCC : Yes/No Internet:Yes/No Index:Yes/No LR 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD) No.18287 of 2025 To 1. The Additional District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Vedasandur. 2.The State of Tamilnadu, Represented by the Inspector of Police, Vedasandur Police Station, Dindigul District. In Crime No.902/2021. 3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD) No.18287 of 2025 SUNDER MOHAN , J. LR CRL.O.P (MD) No.18287 of 2025 27.10.2025 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis