Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010247602024 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3637/2024 1: THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS REP. BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AND VETERINARY DEPARTMENT DISPUR, ASSAM, GHY-06 2: THE DIRECTOR OF ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AND VETERINARY DEPARTMENT ASSAM CHENIKUTHI GUWAHATI-03 3: THE BID PROCESS MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AND VETERINARY DEPARTMENT ASSAM CHENIKUTHI GUWAHATI-03 ASSAM 4: THE DISTRICT ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AND VETERINARY OFFICER NALBARI ASSAM PIN-78133 VERSUS 1: BALEN ROY MEDHI AND ANR S/O- LATE RAJMOHAN ROYMEDHI, R/O- BHARALUMUKH, KUMARPARA, KRB ROAD, GHY-09, P.S- BHARALUMUKH, DIST- KAMRUP (M), ASSAM, PIN-781009 2:DIGANTA BORAH RESIDENT OF SIVAMANDIR PATH KHANAPARA GUWAHATI-22 ASSAM For the Applicant(s) : Mr. D. Nath, Senior Govt. Advocate, Assam. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. J. Kalita, Advocate for respondent No.1. Page No.# 2/3 – B E F O R E – HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. VIJAY BISHNOI HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI 24.01.2025 (Vijay Bishnoi, CJ) The matter comes upon for consideration of the interlocutory application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 with a prayer to condone the delay of 1(one) day in filing the connected appeal. Mr. J. Kalita, learned counsel has put in appearance on behalf of the contesting respondent No.1. The respondent No.2 is proforma respondent. Mr. J. Kalita, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.1 has submitted that he no objection if the delay of 1(one) day occurred in filing the connected appeal is condoned. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case, the delay of 1(one) day in filing the connected appeal is condoned. The interlocutory application is disposed of. Registry is directed to register the connected appeal. At this stage, Mr. D. Nath, learned Senior Government Advocate, Assam representing the applicants has submitted that an identical writ appeal preferred before this Court has already been admitted. In view of the above, we deem it appropriate to order that after registration of the connected writ appeal, the same may be treated as admitted. Ordered accordingly. Since the contesting respondent No.1 in this application as well as in the writ appeal is one and the same person, who is represented by the learned counsel, no need to issue formal notice of the writ appeal, which is to be registered. Page No.# 3/3 List the connected writ appeal after its registration along with Writ Appeal No.381/2024 while reflecting the name of Mr. J. Kalita in the cause-list as the counsel for the respondent No.1. JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Comparing Assistant