MS. NISPILA O. SANGMA AND ORS. v. ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.,
I.A.(Civil)/3783/2024 · 2025-03-02
Susmita Phukan Khaund
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20986 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20986 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010246092024
2025:GAU-AS:2191
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3783/2024 MS. NISPILA O. SANGMA AND ORS.
W/O- LATE PLEADIASH CH. SANGMA, R/O- VILL. AND P.O. KINANGAON, P.S. BOKO, DIST.- KAMRUP(R), ASSAM, PIN- 781124.
2: SRI TREMINGTHON SANGMA F/O- LATE PLEADIASH CH. SANGMA S/O- RAJENDRA A. MOMIN R/O- VILL. AND P.O. KINANGAON P.S. BOKO DIST.- KAMRUP(R) ASSAM PIN- 781124.
3: MISS MANKAMCHINA O. SANGMA D/O- LATE PLEADIASH CH. SANGMA R/O- VILL. AND P.O. KINANGAON P.S. BOKO DIST.- KAMRUP(R) ASSAM PIN- 781124.
4: MISS ARCHIMA O. SANGMA D/O- LATE PLEADIASH CH. SANGMA R/O- VILL. AND P.O. KINANGAON P.S. BOKO DIST.- KAMRUP(R) ASSAM PIN- 781124.
(RESPONDENT NO. 3 AND 4 ARE REP. BY APPLICANT NO. 1) VERSUS ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD., (A CENTRAL GOVT. UNDERTAKING) HAVING ITS REGIONAL OFFICE AT
Page No.# 2/3 GUWAHATI, ULUBARI, GUWAHATI, 781007, REP. BY THE REGIONAL MANAGER, GAUHATI REGIONAL OFFICE, ULUBARI, GUWAHATI- 781007. Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A MANNAF, Advocate for the Respondent : MS. R D MOZUMDAR,
BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND
ORDER Date : 03-03-2025
Heard Mr. A. Mannaf, learned counsel for the applicants; Mr. S.P. Sharma,
learned counsel for the Insurer and Mr. B. Chowdhury, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 5 and 6.
2. The applicant has filed this application to withdraw the amount of Rs.4,90,028/- (Rupees Four Lacs Ninety Thousand and Twenty Eight) deposited by the Insurer.
3. Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection.
4. Considering the submissions at the bar, the prayer for withdrawal of the deposited amount of Rs.4,90,028/- (Rupees Four Lacs Ninety Thousand and Twenty Eight) by the applicant is allowed subject to the condition that the applicant submits an indemnity bond before the Registry of this Court to the satisfaction of the Registry, who may allow the applicant to withdraw the amount after proper verification.
5. In terms of the above observation, this Interlocutory Application stands
Page No.# 3/3
disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant