APHC010296612008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 7019/2008 Between: 1. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, TAMILNADU STATE., VIJAI MEDICAL COLLEGE RAOD, TANJAVUR-613007, TAMILNADU STATE. ...PETITIONER AND 1. AUTH UNDER MINIMUM WAGES ACT ASST COMM ANANTHASPUR 2ANO, OF LABOUR, ANANTAPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 2. MR R VENKATA NAIDU MEDICAL REPRESENTATIVE, REP. BY SECRETARY, A.P.MEDICAL & SALES REPRESENTATIVES UNIOPN, ANANTAPUR. 3. MR MAQBOOL AHMED AREA SALES MANAGER, PHARM PRODUCTS PVT.LTD., D.NO.122/23, SAGUMANDI STREET, KURNOOL. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ order or Direction more in the nature of Writ of Certiorari calling for records in Case M.W.NNo.12 of 2006 on the 1st Respondent herein and quash the order of the 1st respondent dated 13-03- 2008 as illegal, perverse and consequently dismiss the case M.W.NNo.12 of 2006 filed by the 2nd respondent in the interest of justice and equity and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2008(WPMP 9194 OF 2008 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings Case M.W.NNo.12 of 2006 on the file of the 1st respondent herein and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant Leave for filing of the Counter Affidavit in WP.No. 7019 of 2008 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V HARI HARAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR LABOUR The Court made the following: ORDER Despite listing the matter under the caption “for dismissal”, there is no representation for the petitioner. This shows that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the matter. In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI RR