Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20979 (BOM)

GANGARAM RAMA ADGULWAD @ ADULWAR (DIED) THR. LRS. SAKHUBAI G. ADGULWAD AND ORS v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. DIST. COLLECTOR, NANDED AND ORS

CA/1399/2025 · 2025-04-21

Shri S G Chapalgaonkar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

45-CA-1399-5.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 45 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1399 OF 2025 IN FAST/17514/2024 GANGARAM RAMA ADGULWAD @ ADULWAR (DIED) THR. LRS. SAKHUBAI G. ADGULWAD AND ORS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. DIST. COLLECTOR, NANDED AND ORS …. Mr. U. R. Awate h/for Mr. K. M. Nagarkar, Advocate for Applicants Mr. D. B. Bhange, AGP for the Respondents-State .… CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J. DATE : 21.04.2025 PER COURT :- . Heard Mr. Awate, learned Advocate appearing for the Applicants and learned AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. None appears for Respondent No.3, in spite of service of notice. 2. Mr. Awate, learned advocate appearing for the Applicants invites attention of this Court to the reasons as stated in paragraph Nos. 4 and 5 of the Application which contends that the delay caused in filing appeal is unintentional. 3. Considering submissions advanced and reasons as stated in paragraph Nos.4 & 5, sufficient cause is made out to condone the delay. Hence, following order: 1 of 2 2025:BHC-AUG:11588 (( 2 )) 45-CA-1399-5 ORDER a. Civil Application is allowed. b. Delay of 322 days caused in filing Appeal is hereby condoned. c. Appeal be registered subject to removal of office objections, if any. [ S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J. ] HRJadhav 2 of 2