Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:18543-DB WA No. 466 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JUNE, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO WRIT APPEAL NO.466 OF 2024 (SCST)
BETWEEN:
SMT. VAJRAMMA D/O LATE DEPO MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, RESIDING AT A.K.COLONY, THALAGHATTAPURA VILLAGE AND POST, UTTARAHALLI HOBLI, BENGLAURU-560 061. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. PRADEEP M., ADVOCATE-ABSENT) AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BENGALURU-560 001.
2.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT, BENGLAURU-560 009.
Digitally signed by VIJAYALAKSHMI B N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:18543-DB WA No. 466 of 2024
3.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BENGALURU SOUTH SUB-DIVISION, KANDAYA BHAVANA, 2nd FLOOR, BENGALURU-560 009.
4.
SMT. JAYANTHI SHIVARAM W/O SHIVARAM AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/AT No.109, 4TH CROSS, R.K. LAYOUT, PADMANABHANAGAR, BENGALURU-560 070.
PRESENTLY RESIDING AT NO.74 RAGHAVENDRA LAYOUT, GUBALALA, THALAGHATTAPURA BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK, BENGALURU-560 062. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.S.ARUN, AGA FOR R-1 TO R-3;
SRI. P.P.HEGDE, SENIOR COUNSEL A/W MS.SAKSHA BHAGVAN FOR C/R-4)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO a)SET-ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE IN WP NO.45868/2017(SC-ST) DATED 09-12-2019. b)SET-ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED IN REVIEW PETITION NO.84/2021 DATED 27-06-2023 c)PASS SUCH OTHER ORDERS AS MAY BE DEEMED APPROPRIATE UNDER THE
FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF CASE BY THIS HON’BLE COURT IN THE ENDS OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:18543-DB WA No. 466 of 2024
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN)
There is no appearance for the appellant.
We also notice that the office objections have not been complied with inspite of granting sufficient time. Question regarding maintainability has also not been answered. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non compliance of office objections.
Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE
Sd/- (Dr.K.MANMADHA RAO) JUDGE
GH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 35