[2025:RJ-JP:25849] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1221/2021 Ram Ratan Gurjar Son Of Shri Phoola Ram Gurjar, Aged About 35 Years, Resident Of V.p.o. Keshwana Gurjar, Tehsil Kotputli District Jaipur (Rajasthan) ----Petitioner Versus 1. Chief Secretary, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur 302005. 2. Collector, Jaipur, District Jaipur (Rajasthan) 302016. 3. Sub- Divisional Officer, Kotputli Tehsil Kotputli Distt. Jaipur (Rajasthan) 303108. 4. Tehsildar, Tehsil Kotputli Distt. Jaipur (Rajasthan) 303108. 5. Managing Director, R.i.i.c.o., Udyog Bhawan, Jaipur (Rajasthan) 302005. ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4166/2018 Mool Chand Yadav Son Of Shri Prabhati Lal Yadav, Resident Of Vpo Banar Tehsil Kotputli District - Jaipur Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan Through Its Chief Secretary, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur 302005 2. Collector, Jaipur, District Jaipur Rajasthan 302016. 3. Sub- Divisional Officer, Kotputli, Tehsil Kotputli Distt. Jaipur Rajasthan 4. Tehsildar, Tehsil Kotputli, Distt. Jaipur Rajasthan 303108 5. Rajasthan State Industrial Development And Investment Corporation Limited Through Its Managing Direc, C- Scheme, Jaipur Rajasthan ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajendra Soni Dr. Nitin Soni For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ravinder Pal Singh for Mr. Neeraj Batra, GC JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 12/07/2025 [2025:RJ-JP:25849] (2 of 2) [CW-1221/2021] 1. After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that a direction be issued to the Sub-Divisional Officer, Kotputli to decide the claim petition of the petitioners seeking alternative land in lieu of the land of the petitioners, which was acquired by the respondents. Learned counsel submits that the aforesaid claim/notice for demand of justice submitted by the petitioners is pending before the SDO for a considerable time, so appropriate directions be issued for deciding the same in accordance with law by passing a reasoned order. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the respondents have no objection. 3. Considering the limited prayer made by counsel for the petitioners, these writ petitions stand disposed of with directions to the Sub-Divisional Officer, Kotputli to decide the claim/notice for demand of justice (pending, if any) submitted by the petitioners, expeditiously as early as possible, preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 4. In case, any adverse order is passed against the petitioners, they would be at liberty to avail the alternative remedy available under the law. 5. Stay applications as well as all applications (pending, if any) also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Karan/31-32