Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20968 (AP)

G. Krishna Shankar v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/19589/2020 · 2025-09-07

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010295542020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 19589/2020 Between: 1. G. KRISHNA SHANKAR, S/O. SRI G. URUKUNDAPPA AGE 38 YEAR, OCC RAILWAY EMPLOYEE, R/O. H.NO. 98/1, RAILWAY COLONY, WRITERS BASTHI, KOTHAGUDEM TOWN BHADRDRI KOTHGUDEM DISTRICT-507101 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KURNOOL DISTRICT, KURNOOL. 3. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PEAPILLY POLICE STATION, PEAPULLY TOWN, KURNOOL DISTRICT 4. T SIVAMALLESWARI, D/O. SRI T. SURYA CHARAN PEDDA PUJERLA VILLAGE AND POSTPEAPULLY MANDL, KURNOOL DISTRICT, A.P 5. T SURYA CHARAN, PEDDA PUJERLA VILLAGE AND POST PEAPULLY MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT, A.P ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NARASIMHA MURTHY GOLLAMUDI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 19589 of 2020 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue a Writ Order or Direction. More particularly a Writ in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS declaring the action of the 3rd respondent calling the petitioner, his father and brother to the 3rd respondent police station without there being any complaint, as bad, illegal, un-authorized, arbitrary, opposed to law and pass.…” 2. Heard Sri G. Narasimha Murthy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V. Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the police are calling the petitioner, his father and brother to the police station, in the absence of any crime registered and interfering with the civil disputes in between the petitioners and the unofficial respondents. Learned counsel would further submit that a direction may be given to the police. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the police are not interfering in the civil disputes between petitioner and the unofficial respondents. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 6. Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to call the petitioner to the police station in the absence of any crime registered against the petitioner. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 08.09.2025. TVN HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.19589 of 2020 Dated.08.09.2025 TVN 144