IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 289/2 CWP-11004-2001 (O&M) Date of Decision: 21.05.2025 Er. Varinder Kumar Jindal, Chief Engineer …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: - Ms. Kajal, Advocate for Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Rajni Gupta, Additional Advocate General, Haryana Mr. Hitesh Pandit, Advocate for respondent-Corporation *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral) 1. The petitioner through instant petition is assailing his allocation and transfer in Haryana Power Generation Corporation Limited. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that she has no instructions from her client. 3. Learned counsel for respondent submits that the petitioner has already retired on attaining the age of superannuation, thus, present petition has rendered infructuous. 4. Dismissed as infructuous. 5. The petitioner is at liberty to move an appropriate application within three months, if cause survives. 6. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 21.05.2025 Mohit Kumar Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No MOHIT KUMAR 2025.05.21 17:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgement.