Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20967 (PAT)

Virendra Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar and Ors

CWJC/3280/2016 · 2025-07-15

Rajiv Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3280 of 2016 ====================================================== Virendra Kumar Singh son of Late Gauri Shankar Singh, resident of village and P.O.- Kuari, Madan, P.S.- Mejarganj, District- Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Old Secretariat, Patna 3. Deputy Director, Consolidation, Sitamarhi 4. Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Sitamarhi 5. Circle Officer, Mejarganj, District- Sitamarhi 6. Jai Shankar Singh S/o Late Ram Sevak Singh 7. Mani Shankar Singh son of Late Ram Sevak Singh Both are resident of village- Balua Tola Madhopur Maliniya, P.O. Madhopur Maliniya, P.S. Mejarganj, District- Sitamarhi ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kr Singh No.1, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sita Ram Yadav, GP-16 : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Shrivastav, AC to GP-16 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 2 15-07-2025 Heard the parties. 2. The present petition has been preferred for the grant of following relief(s): “(i) For issuance of an appropriate writ/writs, direction/directions, order/orders directing the respondents to comply the orders passed by the respondent no.4, Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Sitamarhi on 14.03.2014 in Land Dispute Case No. 79/2013/14 by which the Patna High Court CWJC No.3280 of 2016(2) dt.15-07-2025 2/2 learned court below has directed to the Circle Officer, Majarganj to demarcate Survey plot no. 1796, Area 7 decimal of Majorganj Thana No. 51 by the Government Aamin and if the same is found illegally encroached by any party, remove the encroachment form the disputed land. (ii) For issuance of any other appropriate writ/writs, direction/directions, order/orders as this Hon’ble Court may think fit and proper.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the petition. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. vinayak/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U