Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20965 (GAU)

GEETA KAKATI PATHAK v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS,

WP(C)/6343/2024 · 2025-06-03

Kaushik Goswami

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010246962024 2025:GAU-AS:7307 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/6343/2024 GEETA KAKATI PATHAK W/O SRI MRINAL KUMAR PATHAK, RESIDENT OF AMBARI HATI, PO AND DIST BARPETA, ASSAM 781301 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS, REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT, DISPUR GUWAHATI 06 2:THE STATE CHIEF INFORMATION COMMISSIONER ASSAM GADAPANI PATH JURIPAR PANJABARI GUWAHATI 781037 3:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER BARPETA ASSAM 781301 4:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER BAJALI DISTRICT AND PO PATHSALA ASSAM 781325 5:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER KAMRUP M HENGRABARI GUWAHATI ASSAM 781036 Page No.# 2/3 6:THE REVENUE CIRCLE OFFICER CHENGA REVENUE CIRCLE OFFICE CHENGA. PO CHENGA DIST BARPETA ASSAM 781305 7:SRI PRANJIT KUMAR DEV ADC KAMRUP M HENGRABARI GUWAHATI ASSAM 781036 8:SRI MANTU KUMAR DAS DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE SENIOR ASSISTANT (DASA) SARTHEBARI REVENUE CIRCLE PO SARTHEBARI DIST BARPETA ASSAM 78130 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR K BHUYAN, MR. M U E BHUYAN,R K TALUKDAR Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, REVENUE BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI ORDER Date : 04.06.2025 Heard Mr. M. U. E. Bhuyan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. J. Handique, learned Government Advocate appearing for the State respondent and Mr. A. Bhattacharjee, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Revenue & Disaster Management Department. Mr. M. U. E. Bhuyan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the writ petition in the meantime has become infructuous and accordingly makes an endorsement to the same effect. Page No.# 3/3 In view of the aforesaid endorsement, nothing survives for adjudication in the matter. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed on being infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant