LINGISETTY NAGA RAJESWARI v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/19560/2020 · 2025-09-03
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20964 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20964 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010295832020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 19560/2020 Between:
1. LINGISETTY NAGA RAJESWARI, LINGISETTY NAGA RAJESWARI, W/O VENKATA SWAMY, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC HOUSE- WIFE, R/O. FLAT NO.300, SATYA GRAND APARTMENT, 2/17, BRODIPET, GUNTUR.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR RURAL, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT
3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NADENDLA POLICE STATION, NADENDLA, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction on the part of the respondent No.3 in investigating into the crime in FIR No. 124 /2020, dated 12-07-2020 on the file the Nadendla Police Station expeditiously is as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and violative of Fundamental Rights enshrined under the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 31-4 respondent to
2
investigate into the crime in FIR No. 124 / 2020 dated 12-07-2020 within a fixed time directed by the Hon'ble High Court and complete the investigation under the supervision of the respondent No.2 and file final report / charge sheet under section 173 (2) Cr.P.C., and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to forthwith direct the 3rd respondent to investigate into the crime in FIR No. 124 / 2020 dated 12-07-2020 within a fixed time directed by the Hon'ble High Court and complete the investigation under the supervision of the respondent No.2 and file final report / charge sheet under section 173 (2) Cr.P.C. and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. RAMESH BETHAPUDI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
3
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction on the part of the respondent No.3 in investigating into the crime in FIR No. 124 /2020, dated 12-07-2020 on the file the Nadendla Police Station expeditiously is as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and violative of Fundamental Rights enshrined under the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 31-4 respondent to investigate into the crime in FIR No. 124 / 2020 dated 12-07-2020 within a fixed time directed by the Hon'ble High Court and complete the investigation under the supervision of the respondent No.2 and file final report / charge sheet under section 173 (2) Cr.P.C., and pass...…”
2. Heard Sri B.Ramesh, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the relief has become infructuous in this matter.
4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader is in attendance.
5. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed since the relief has become infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 04.09.2025 MH
4
5
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
21
W.P.No.19560 of 2025
Dated.04.09.2025
MH