- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:1017 WP No. 8483 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 8483 OF 2021 (GM-BWSSB) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. SUJATHA. K D/O. LATE R. NARAYANA REDDY, W/O. KESHVA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/AT NO. 147, OPP. TO SIGMA ARCADE, MARATHAHALLI, BENGALURU-560 037. 2. SMT. SHASHIKALA.N D/O. LATE R.NARAYANA REDDY, W/O. VISHWANATH, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/AT NO. 1103, 'A' BLOCK, KNIGHT BRIGHT APARTMENT, NEAR BROOK FIELD, KUNDALAHALLI, BENGALURU-560 037. 3. SMT. LAKSHMI.N D/O. LATE R.NARAYANA REDDY, W/O. LAKSHMAN REDDY, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/AT CKB COMPOUND, AIRPORT ROAD, MARATHAHALLI, BEHIND AXIS BANK LIMITED, BENGALURU-560 037. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. N.NANJUNDA SWAMY., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:1017 WP No. 8483 of 2021 AND: 1. THE BENGALURU WATER SUPPLY AND SEWERAGE BOARD, KAVERI BHAVAN, K.G. ROAD, BENGALURU-560 009, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN. 2. THE OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, THE BENGALURU WATER SUPPLY AND SEWERAGE BOARD, KASTHURINAGARA, OMBR LAYOUT, 3RD MAIN, BANASAWADI, BENGALURU-560 00 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B.L.SANJEEV., ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the petitioners are not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 08.01.2025, on that day, when the matter is called, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners, either personally or through video conferencing. Hence, for - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:1017 WP No. 8483 of 2021 appearance of counsel for the petitioners it was ordered to be listed on 10.01.2025. The petition is listed today for appearance of counsel for the petitioners. As already noted above, when the case is called, the petitioners are not represented. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6