Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:15959 CRL.A No. 351 of 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 351 OF 2013 (A) BETWEEN:
M/S. BHANU ENTERPRISES NO.35, 1ST BLOCK, 15TH CROSS R.T.NAGAR, BANGALORE-32 REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR MR. P.H. MAHADEVAN …APPELLANT (BY SRI. SANGAMESH R.B, ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
SRI. KRISHNA BRICKS NO.A.G. EAST BLOCK 'SHRADDHA BRINDHAVAN' HVR LAYOUT, KUNDLAHALLI BANGALORE-37
2.
K.N. PADMA REDDY PROPRIETOR SRI KRISHNA BRICKS NO.A.G EAST BLOCK 'SHRADDHA BRINDHAVAN' HVR LAYOUT, KUNDLAHALLI BANGALORE-37 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B.C. RAJANNA, ADVOCATE FOR R1;
SRI. RAMESH AND SRI. G. UDHAYA KUMAR, ADVOCATES FOR R2)
THIS CRL.A IS FILED U/S.378(4) OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED:11.02.13 PASSED BY THE
Digitally signed by SHAKAMBARI Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:15959 CRL.A No. 351 of 2013
XVIII ACMM AND XX ASCJ, BANGALORE IN C.C.NO.24477/2006 - ACQUITTING THE RESPONDENT/ ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S.138 OF N.I. ACT.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR REPORTING SETTLEMENT, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR
ORAL JUDGMENT Both the counsels are present.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the appeal. Said memo reads as under:
"The Appellants beg to withdraw the above appeal, as the parties have amicably settled their dispute outside the court. Hence, the appeal may be disposed as withdrawn in the interest of Justice, Equity and Good Conscience
In view of the memo, appeal is disposed of.
Sd/- (RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR) JUDGE
SK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 12