APHC010295332025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 14965 OF 2025 Between: M. Narayana Chaitanya, S/o. M. Guruprasad, Aged about 35 years, R/o. D,No.7/822. Mochampet Kadapa, YSR Kadapa District ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary. Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department A.P. Secretarial at Veiagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District 2. The Madanapalii Municipality, Rep, by its Commissioner. Madanapalle, Annamayya District ...Respondent(S) Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd Respondent in not considering the Petitioner s Representation, dt, 12.5,2025, herein, the Petitioner requested the 2 Respondent either to acquire or pay compensation for the land an extent of Ac.2.77 cents in Sy.No.276B/1 B, Ac.0.50 cents in Sy.No.276B/1 A totaling to Ac.3.27cents of Bandameeda Kammapalli Revenue Village, Madanapalii Mandal, Annamayya District as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2 nd Respondent to take steps for acquisition and payment of S!' compensation for the land an extent of Ac.2.77 cents in Sy.No.276B/1 B. Ac.0,50 cents in Sy.No,276B/1A totaiing to Ac,3.27cents of Bandameeda Kammapalli Revenue Village. Madanapalii Mandal, Annamayya District. lA NO: 1 OF 2n2fi Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court pleased to direct the 2"'^ Respondent to consider Petitioner’s Representation, dt. 12.5.2025. may be and pass orders on Counsel for the Petitioner: G RAMESH BABU Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI G. LAKSHMI NARAYANA { SC FOR MUNICIPALITY) The Court made the following: ORDER iV A APHC010295332025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH ATAMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] WEDNESDAY ,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 14965/2025 Between: M Narayana Chaitanya ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.G RAMESH BABU Counsel for the Respondent{S): 1.GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV The Court made the following: Clii 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 14965/2025 ORDER; The present Writ Petition is filed questioning the action of the Respondent No. 2 in not considering the Petitioner’s representation dated 12.05.2025 wherein the Petitioner sought for compensation for an extent of Ac.2.77 cents in Sy.No.276B/1B and Ac.0.50 cents in Sy.No.276B/1A, totaling to Ac.3.27 cents of Bandameeda Kammapalli Revenue Village, Madanapalli Mandal, Annamayya District as illegal and arbitrary. 2. The Petitioner claims right over the schedule property under Registered Partition Deed dated 19.08.1930 vide Doc.No. 140/1930, which was followed by another Partition Deed dated 14.09.1944 vide Document No. 1989/1944. Thereafter, subsequent document relied on by the Petitioner is a Registered Will dated 24.01.2019 executed by his father in favour of the Petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the land referred above was being used for the purpose of vegetable market by the Respondent Authorities without paying compensation or issuing TDR for the land in question. In that context, the Petitioner gave a representation A'- 3 on 12.05.2025 to the Respondent Authorities, but no action has been taken on the said representation till now. Therefore, the Petitioner filed the present Writ Petition. 4. Learned Standing Counsel for the Respondent Municipality passed on the Written Instructions signed by the Commissioner, Madanapalle Municipality and submitted that a repiy was issued on 21.05.2025 through the learned Standing Counsel for Madanapalle Municipality on the instructions of the Respondent Authorities denying the claim of the Petitioner. It was mentioned in the reply notice that the property was vested with the Government since time immemorial and therefore, the Petitioner cannot claim for any compensation . 5. As there is a denial of claim of the Petitioner by the Respondent Authorities over the subject property, this Court is of the opinion that the Petitioner can agitate these aspects in a properiy instituted suit rather than pursuing this Writ Petition. 6. With the above observation, the Writ Petition is disposed of. Liberty is given to the Petitioner to pursue his civil remedies before appropriate forum. There shall be no order as to costs. 'A 4 As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- K TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTfbN OFFICER To, State of Andhra Pradesh, Municipal Administration Development Department A.P. Secretarial at Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District 2. The Commissioner, Madanapaii Municipality, Madanapalle, Annamayya District 3. One CC to SRI. G RAMESH BABU Advocate [OPUC] SRI. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV Advocate 1. The Principal Secretary and Urban 4. One CC to [OPUC] 5. One CC to SRI. G. LAKSHMI NARAYANA, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Three CD Copies nm HIGH COURT DATED:25/06/2025 ORDER WP 14965/2025 0 4 JUL 2025 ys & o Co ^^^<urrent Section^^ DISPOSING OF THE WP WITHOUT COSTS