Special Deputy Collector-cum-Land Acquisition v. P Eswara Reddy
LAAS/286/2017 · 2025-08-20
Ninala Jayasurya, Tuhin Kumar Gedela
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20954 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20954 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010036712017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3549] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT Nos: 263, 278, 282, 286, 314 of 2017 LAAS No.263 of 2017: Between:
1. SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR CUM LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, TELUGUGANGA PROJECT, NANDYAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT.
...APPELLANT AND
1. P RAMBHUPAL REDDY, S/o.Rosi Reddy R/o.Mandaluru Village, Rudravaram Mandal, Kurnool District.
...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant:
1. GP FOR APPEALS (AP) Counsel for the Respondent:
1. BALLA RAVINDRANATH & SAVITHRI DEVI
2
The Court made the following Common Judgment: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ninala Jayasurya)
The present batch of appeals have been filed against a common order dated 21.01.2016 in L.A.O.P.Nos.351, 350, 349, 347 and 348 of 2012 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool District.
2. Heard Sri T.S.Rayulu, learned Government Pleader for Appeals. Also heard Smt.Savithri Devi, learned counsel for the respondents, who appeared through online.
3. At the time of considering the appeals, it is noted that, in respect of the acquisition of lands in Mandaluru Village for the purpose of excavation of 46R Minor Distributory in Block No.21 of Telugu Ganga Project, a batch of appeals came up for consideration before a co-ordinate bench of this Court and after detailed consideration, vide orders dated 10.07.2025 in L.A.A.S.No.409 of 2016 and batch, the market value of Rs.1,00,000/- per acre, as fixed by the Reference Court, was not interfered with.
4. In view of the same and for the reasons alike, the present batch of appeals are liable to be dismissed and the same are accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.
5. As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any, in these cases, shall stand closed. ____________________ NINALA JAYASURYA,J
______________________________ TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA,J Date : 21.08.2025 BMS