Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 209535 (MAD)

Sivagangai Roman Catholic Doicese v. A.Naina Mohammed

CMP(MD)/5613/2025 · 2025-10-24

P Vadamalai

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CMP(MD) NO. 5613 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 24-10-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE P.VADAMALAI CMP(MD) NO. 5613 of 2025 IN SA(MD) SR NO. 44826 of 2024 Sivagangai Roman Catholic Doicese through its Procurator, Britto Nagar, Melur Road, Sivagangai. Petitioner(s) Vs 1.A.Naina Mohammed 2.A.Mohammed Meerasa 3.G.Mohammed Afsal Nasar 4.G.Seeni Kabeer 5.G.Shajahan 6.TSMA Abdul Jafar 7.TSMA Mohammed Usain 8.TSMA Shahul Hameed 9.TSMA Ahamed Jalaudeen 10.A.Sabarikumar Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): Mr.J.Anandkumar, Advocate 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP(MD) NO. 5613 of 2025 For Respondent(s): Mr.D.Balamurugapandi, Advocate for R1 to R9 R10 – No Appearance Prayer : Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed to condone the delay of 11 days in filing the present Second Appeal in S.A(MD)SR No.44826 of 2024. ORDER This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 11 days in filing the Second Appeal in S.A(MD)SR No.44826 of 2024 before this Court. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 9, and I have perused the affidavit filed in support of this petition. 3. The name of the 10th respondent has been printed in the cause list. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP(MD) NO. 5613 of 2025 4. The learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 9 has not raised any serious objection to this petition. 5. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is allowed. 24-10-2025 mkn 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP(MD) NO. 5613 of 2025 P.VADAMALAI, J. mkn CMP(MD) NO. 5613 of 2025 IN SA(MD) SR NO. 44826 of 2024 24.10.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis