Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2095 (UTT)

SAISH BABU KASAI ALIAS RAISH BABU v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

ABA/151/2025 · 2025-02-14

Ravindra Maithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Anticipatory Bail Application No. 151 of 2025 Saish Babu Kasai @ Raish Babu ...Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ….Respondent Present:- Mr. Pranav Singh, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. S.C. Dumka, A.G.A. for the State. Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral) Applicant seeks anticipatory bail in Case Crime No.0051 of 2025, under Sections 3/5/11 of the Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act, 2007, Police Station Kotwali Roorkee, District Haridwar. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. It is argued by learned counsel for the applicant that there is no evidence against the applicant; merely based on the statement of unknown informant, the applicant has been implicated in the case; the applicant has no criminal history. 4. Learned State Counsel would submit that no separate objection is required to be filed, as such. The anticipatory bail application may be decided based on the material available on record. He admits that based on the information of the informant, the applicant has been implicated in the case. 2 5. Having considered, this Court is of the view that this is a case, in which the applicant should be granted anticipatory bail. The instant anticipatory bail application deserves to be allowed. 6. The anticipatory bail application is allowed. 7. In the eventuality of arrest, the applicant shall be enlarged on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer (“AO”). In addition to it, the applicant shall also comply with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall co-operate with the investigation. (ii) The applicant shall not approach any witness in any manner, whatsoever. (iii) The applicant shall not leave the country without prior permission of the court concerned. (iv) The applicant shall deposit his passport with the AO. The passport may only be returned by the order of the court concerned. In case the applicant does not have passport, he shall give an undertaking to that effect to the AO. (v) The applicant shall also give an undertaking on (i), (ii) & (iii) above. (Ravindra Maithani, J.) 14.02.2025 Ravi Bisht